Belief ranks high among the mysteries of what it means to be human. This is such a murky topic that we have to start with a definition, and the one which I will use is “Confidence and reliance without evidence or proof; acceptance based on testimony or authority.”
An atheist friend of mine once told me, “I would believe in God if he appeared right now, in front of me.” He made this declaration as both a promise and a challenge to God. God did not see fit to comply, so his unbelief persists. I quietly laughed to myself. A visual appearance is no guarantee of anything, as some of the disciples discovered for themselves when Christ rose from the dead and appeared to them. Jesus accepted the difficulty of the matter, eating fish in their presence to show them he was not a ghost. Another persisted in his unbelief: “I don’t believe my eyes, so I won’t believe until I touch his wounds with my own hands.” Christ said, “come and touch them; don’t persist in your unbelief but believe.” He touched them and declared “my God!” Still others continued in their unbelief after all this. Even when they witnessed Christ ascend into heaven some of the disciples “still doubted.” Seeing, touching, hearing – a complete reliance upon the senses is certainly no guarantee of belief.
Of course we can disbelieve that any of those events even transpired at all. But even atheists are faced with the challenge of disbelief on a regular basis. Many atheists think of themselves as highly intelligent and enlightened, certainly much more enlightened than the silly fools who would accept the testimony of a group of folks from two thousand years ago. Yet there is something about being human which makes it difficult to cast off the need for myth, ritual and belief. Many atheists have their own religion – science, and the priests of their religion are scientists. And so the revelation of science becomes their dogma. Even so, I have encountered the mystery of unbelief here, too. I have presented the results of scientific studies to them which conflict with their own thoughts of things. “Well, I don’t believe that,” they have told me. “Believe what?” I ask, “the scientists who conducted the research? The data which they gathered?” What exactly are you not “believing” when you disbelieve what your priests and your religion are serving up for you? The result can only be a profoundly narcissistic retreat into the prison of one’s own mind, where one can only accept one’s own thoughts, which are generated not from external reality, or from the testimony and witness of others, but from a simple, fantastical wish of how one wants things to be.
If there were a God, you’d think he would be most interested in revealing himself to help save man from himself. For the believing Christian, two thousand years of a Judaic revelation history of covenants, prophets, judges and kings culminating in the fullness of time by the incarnation of God as a human person, followed by another two thousand years of salvation history expressed as testimony and authority, offer more than enough substance for an engaged, active belief. But it comes at the cost of a certain kind of violence against the lower nature of man which, for the astute, is itself a sign of authenticity.
“We are giving our testimony to what we have seen, heard and touched with our own hands – the Word of life, so that you may share our life.” (1 John 1.1-2)







Greed, Vanity and Altruism
October 18th, 2009I have discovered through personal experience that one very effective way to combat greed is to view possessions, particularly money, as nothing more than tools. Viewing possessions in this way, as having purpose and not as ends in themselves, one remains detached yet necessarily responsible. Money is a tool.
The same goes with care of the body. In our culture today we are witnessing the cult of the body, the hyperbolic emphasis on self-care, the worship of the flesh and its pleasures, which invariably ends in profound unhappiness because we are quite literally not wired to find joy in making ourselves gods. How is this to be balanced with the responsibility we have to care for ourselves? The most effective way to combat vanity is to view one’s body as being for others. I keep myself physically fit so I can be of use to my elderly neighbors. When they need assistance with lawn care I have an able body to put into action. If I didn’t care for myself I wouldn’t be able to help them. If I stayed fit purely for vanities sake I wouldn’t even notice their need.
We are entering into a remarkable period which has science at profound variance with marketing and consumerism. In the bookstore today I saw advertising signs saying It Really Is All About You! Yet the magazine stand had current issues of Scientific American Mind magazine and Psychology Today which had articles about how the way out of depression is to give yourself away in relationships and how altruism is healthy for the brain.
Altruism can have a profound effect on the social networks in which you move. Of course so can negative contagions such as drug use or crime. However social theorists can now show that human networks over time expel and marginalize individuals bringing such contagion to the network in an attempt to limit the harm it does to the whole. Altruistic individuals, on the other hand, tend to increase and deepen their relationships. The network, recognizing value in these persons, move them deeper into the middle where they exert even greater influence on the whole. This redounds in enormous benefits for the person, increasing their health, happiness and longevity.
Posted in Social Commentary | Comments Off